The Failure of Matrixed Organizations

If you’re unfamiliar with the term “Matrixed Organization”, consider yourself lucky. In the interest of “agility”, many companies have adopted this structure - at their peril.

Matrixed Organizations:
* Arranged in a grid rather than a hierarchy
* Employees accountable to multiple bosses via two or more separate chains of command
* Responsibility for a given deliverable distributed across several directors

Matrixed organizations promised open communication between teams, facilitation of innovation, and reduced need for realignment for each new project. They have failed to deliver.

People, let’s stop the madness, shall we? This way of arranging an organization runs entirely counter to the goal of agility. Here’s why:

a) Matrixed Organizations exacerbate staffing issues.
In Matrixed Organizations individuals report to multiple leaders. Let’s pause right there. See the absurdity? In a time when companies are struggling to recruit enough individual contributors, they’re pivoting toward more “bosses” directing the activities of fewer “do-ers”. Matrixed Organizations exacerbate staffing issues! 

b) Matrixed Organizations muddy accountability.
Giving someone more than one manager instantly results in a lack of clarity on their true priorities. People are either pulled in multiple directions, or left floating aimlessly. When people are given conflicting instructions, or don’t know what’s expected of them, it leads to chaos - progress isn’t made and frustration runs high. It’s a fatal flaw – Matrixed Organizations by their very nature undercut one of the most fundamental management principles – people must have clear goals. Matrixed Organizations muddy accountability!

c) Matrixed Organizations slow decision-making.
Establishing multiple middle and senior managers with overlapping spheres dramatically bogs down the decision-making process. With no one quite sure who is empowered to make a given call, but simultaneously no one wanting to miss a chance to weigh in and influence each outcome, even the simplest decisions take forever (if they can be made at all). Teams spend much more time getting buy in on every little thing, even when consensus is not needed. Matrixed Organizations slow down decision-making!

Matrixed Organizations are a failed experiment and it’s time to pull the plug. The idealized vision of overlapping departments functioning harmoniously is fundamentally flawed. By setting up top-heavy org. charts, obfuscating roles and responsibilities, and bogging down the decision-making process, the Matrixed Organization makes staffing more challenging, managing more difficult, and decision-making slower. Want a nimble, agile organization? Time to leave the Matrix for the real world.
Problem solving misconception
July 26, 2025
Over the years we’ve been exposed to Six Sigma, Juran, Deming PDCA, 8D, Dale Carnegie, A3, Shainin, and more. Each technique works pretty well, and has been demonstrated many times in a wide variety of industries and circumstances. At the core they are all essentially the same! Each approach relies on an underlying logical flow that goes like this: [a] make sure the problem is clearly defined; [b] be open to all sources of information; [c] vet the information for relevance and accuracy; [d] use the process of elimination to narrow down all possible causes to the most likely few; [e] prove which of the suspects is really the cause of the issue; [f] generate a number of potential solutions; [g] evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility and risk of the potential solutions; [h] implement the winning solution(s); and [i] take steps to make sure your solution(s) don’t unravel in the future. The differences between the paradigms resides in supplementary steps and toolkits. For example, 8D contains the important “In
Poor problem solving lob image cost impact
July 26, 2025
Your team is marching through the tools of your company's chosen problem-solving approach. This is time not spent on growing your business or delivering cost reductions. Yet your customers are suffering, and they're not shy about letting you know it! Why isn't it working?
Teams not fast enough mage for blog
July 26, 2025
Does your team struggle to deliver the kind of rapid and effective problem-solving your business requires? Can you really afford the unhappy customers, wasted engineering hours, cost of poor quality, and lost opportunities? Use the Visual 8D™ / Visual CAPA™ approach by CAEDENCE.
Annoyed customers for blog
July 26, 2025
Negative customer experiences can destroy your business! Have you been faced with any angry customers this year? CAEDENCE's Visual 8D™ / Visual CAPA™ enhanced problem-solving toolkit was the answer. It integrates seamlessly with your existing problem-solving approach and systems.
Reality check image
May 9, 2025
Your primary role as a manager is to ensure your team’s success. Internalize this. Make sure your team members know this. Build an environment of trust and collaboration. A direct report of mine would frequently leave me out of the loop as problems escalated, preferring instead to “work harder”. It was clear that he felt uncomfortable delivering bad news to me (his boss) when things were not going according to plan. Let me tell you the rest of the story.
Scheduling to get results image
April 23, 2025
I was struggling to get updates from my regional project management directors. Sensing my frustration at having to constantly repeat my (apparently futile) requests to the team to provide their updates consistently, my boss suggested, “If you want something done, schedule it.” He meant that if updates are needed at a specific time, actually schedule them directly on people's calendars, making the expectation and reminder "automatic" each month, and emphasizing the importance of the updates by turning them into meetings – people tend not to show up empty handed to meetings where they're expected to present. Scheduling removed a bit of "friction" and created a sense of urgency that resulted in real progress. Amazingly, they didn’t miss any updates after that point!
Delegating to others image
April 23, 2025
One of the best bits of advice I received when I first became a manager was to “delegate a task when your team member is 70% as good at it as you are, not 99%.” Many times, people are promoted to management positions because of their strong performance as individual contributors, but then they’re shocked to learn that a whole separate set of skills is required to succeed in their new role. Delegation is high on this list of new skills. Delegation means handing off tasks for someone else to do them. A common mistake is to only hand off a task when the team member is as good as you are at it. This is a trap! While it may seem like a good idea to protect the quality of the task, it doesn’t work in practice.
Agile planning myths image
April 2, 2025
Don’t be fooled by the latest fad in project management, Agile. Agile is pitched as a revolutionary method, but the fact is, it simply DOES NOT GET THE RESULTS that visual waterfall approaches do. Period. We see team after team fail using Agile methods, for very specific reasons. Let’s look at the 6 painful TRUTHs of using Agile methods. You don't need the latest fad, you need to use the best practices to manage a project to completion.
Visual 8D Breakthrough image
April 1, 2025
Problem-solving methods haven’t changed in over 20 years, and some methods have been around for 30-50 years without significant improvement. CAEDENCE has released a novel improvement to problem-solving that overcomes shortfalls in existing methods. Applicable to all structured problem-solving approaches, Visual 8D™ enables teams to execute the familiar problem-solving steps (with no additional effort), while capturing plans and progress in easy-to-follow diagrams. Visual 8D™ puts teams in the position of providing answers to management and customer questions before being asked, resulting in improved control of the situation and minimizing time wasted on extraneous actions.
Ready Aim Fire Image
March 31, 2025
Being action-oriented is a good thing, right? Well, yes and no. There's a big difference between learning and adjusting quickly ("failing fast") and wasting time and resources by "rushing off half cocked". Executives and teams alike are eager to be (and be seen) "doing something", but they often fail to recognize the distinction between 'activity' and 'progress'. As a result, they act upon the first reasonable idea that comes along. The trouble with acting on the first reasonable idea is twofold. First, there might have been much better ideas, and second, once you start working on the first idea, you stop looking for the better ones. Outcomes are often sub-optimal – problems not solved, product not launched, etc. Want to dramatically improve your team's odds of achieving consistently strong outcomes? Next time everyone's ready to run with the first reasonable idea, set aside just 30 minutes and challenge the group with this 3-step process.
Show More