Are your teams not fast enough during problem solving?
Does your team struggle to deliver the kind of rapid and effective problem-solving your business requires? Can you really afford the unhappy customers, wasted engineering hours, cost of poor quality, and lost opportunities?
Teams can improve their problem solving and issue resolution cycle time with Visual 8D™ / Visual CAPA™.
THE PAIN: An issue-resolution team had wrestled with a complicated problem for 18 months without finding the root cause. It was costing millions in time wasted on inconclusive tests and unhelpful customer update meetings. It was distracting the team from new product development and cost reduction priorities. It was an expensive mess!
THE CAUSE: Although they used traditional tools like Is / Is Not, 5-Why, and Fishbone, the team lacked the structure to clarify and sequence their hypotheses – they were chasing every random idea and getting nowhere. Without strong linkage between hypothesis and test plan, they weren't defining effective tests to rule-in or rule-out ideas and establish root cause. Without the right structure they were never going to converge on a solution.
THE VISION: We needed a way to ensure both the internal and customer teams could see the connections between hypotheses and actions, the sequencing of those actions, and progress. Everyone had to understand how their activity was contributing to the determination of the root cause (or change direction if it wasn't). How could we organize the team and the work to ensure focus on key actions that drive root cause determination?
THE SOLUTION: By applying Visual 8D™ / Visual CAPA™ the root cause was found within just 3 months - saving over 75% of the cycle time to closure. Visual 8D™/Visual CAPA™ was simple to customize to the company's problem-solving paradigm and terminology. The straightforward templates guided the team through the problem-solving process while seamlessly producing easy-to-follow visual outputs that customers love.
Your company's chosen approach isn't the problem - it's how your team is executing. V8D™/V-CAPA™ facilitates internal planning, communication, and execution, allowing teams to move much faster.
Networking and communication build and sustain the relationships that make business work. Avoid these bad habits immediately or people will dislike you immediately.
Mastering these 5 missing skills quickly maximizes your productivity and influence, which in turn enhances both job security and advancement potential.
I explained the goal in designing any component. Overly tight specifications would make it harder to find suppliers and would drive up costs. The engineer's entire approach changed.
Preparing for a presentation is vital in enabling team members to convey critical points, and influence outcomes with customers. Here are the steps involved.
When customer tensions rise, the right approach can turn friction into collaboration. At CAEDENCE, we call it the 3C’s: Calm, Clarify, Control. Here's more detail.
Will AI Replace Direct Customer Communication? Absolutely Not! In an age of chatbots and algorithms, the highest-impact discussions still happen person-to-person.
B2B customer relationships are not a breeze. We’ve navigated hundreds of challenging accounts and distilled five secrets that consistently turn friction into forward progress.
Ever notice how a quick fix from the top can feel like a shortcut, but it ends up stunting your team’s growth? When managers rush to answers, they inadvertently affect team development.
Over the years we’ve been exposed to Six Sigma, Juran, Deming PDCA, 8D, Dale Carnegie, A3, Shainin, and more. Each technique works pretty well, and has been demonstrated many times in a wide variety of industries and circumstances. At the core they are all essentially the same!
Each approach relies on an underlying logical flow that goes like this: [a] make sure the problem is clearly defined; [b] be open to all sources of information; [c] vet the information for relevance and accuracy; [d] use the process of elimination to narrow down all possible causes to the most likely few; [e] prove which of the suspects is really the cause of the issue; [f] generate a number of potential solutions; [g] evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility and risk of the potential solutions; [h] implement the winning solution(s); and [i] take steps to make sure your solution(s) don’t unravel in the future.
The differences between the paradigms resides in supplementary steps and toolkits. For example, 8D contains the important “In
Your team is marching through the tools of your company's chosen problem-solving approach. This is time not spent on growing your business or delivering cost reductions. Yet your customers are suffering, and they're not shy about letting you know it! Why isn't it working?
