Handing over the reins – developing up-and-coming leaders
Managers often ask, “How do I develop a high-potential employee into a strong leader?”. While it might seem like a complex topic, actually a few simple steps (revealed below) will put you well on your way to success.
First, give the person a chance to lead. Let them take on responsibility for a small project team and learn by doing (running meetings, steering to completion, etc.). Coach (guide, don’t prescribe) them through the project. They won’t be perfect on the first try, and that’s okay. Mistakes with feedback generate learning. Obviously, you’ll want to intervene to prevent any major disasters, but their occasional “dropping the ball” when the stakes are low, combined with your informative feedback, will set them up to know what to look out for in the future.
As they gain skills and confidence (and you see that you can trust their judgement), give them a more complex, higher-stakes project to facilitate growth. If they have the innate talent, and your guidance is effective, then after a few projects you should have a strong leader capable of bigger things.
The types of assignments well suited to “introduction to leadership” include:
allowing the person to manage 1-2 people before taking on a larger team
having the person lead a challenging customer engagement or problem resolution
assigning them projects with cross-functional team members (to broaden their exposure to other functional activity)
having them present at an industry symposium or large company event
having them take on a department-wide initiative
Leadership isn’t developed in a vacuum – as managers, we need to foster the development of leadership skills and give people opportunities (and support) to thrive in challenging positions. We’ve used this approach successfully for many years in different organizations. It takes a little courage to hand over the reins (they won’t do things the same way as you, and probably not as well, at least at first), but it’s well worth it!
Networking and communication build and sustain the relationships that make business work. Avoid these bad habits immediately or people will dislike you immediately.
Mastering these 5 missing skills quickly maximizes your productivity and influence, which in turn enhances both job security and advancement potential.
I explained the goal in designing any component. Overly tight specifications would make it harder to find suppliers and would drive up costs. The engineer's entire approach changed.
Preparing for a presentation is vital in enabling team members to convey critical points, and influence outcomes with customers. Here are the steps involved.
When customer tensions rise, the right approach can turn friction into collaboration. At CAEDENCE, we call it the 3C’s: Calm, Clarify, Control. Here's more detail.
Will AI Replace Direct Customer Communication? Absolutely Not! In an age of chatbots and algorithms, the highest-impact discussions still happen person-to-person.
B2B customer relationships are not a breeze. We’ve navigated hundreds of challenging accounts and distilled five secrets that consistently turn friction into forward progress.
Ever notice how a quick fix from the top can feel like a shortcut, but it ends up stunting your team’s growth? When managers rush to answers, they inadvertently affect team development.
Over the years we’ve been exposed to Six Sigma, Juran, Deming PDCA, 8D, Dale Carnegie, A3, Shainin, and more. Each technique works pretty well, and has been demonstrated many times in a wide variety of industries and circumstances. At the core they are all essentially the same!
Each approach relies on an underlying logical flow that goes like this: [a] make sure the problem is clearly defined; [b] be open to all sources of information; [c] vet the information for relevance and accuracy; [d] use the process of elimination to narrow down all possible causes to the most likely few; [e] prove which of the suspects is really the cause of the issue; [f] generate a number of potential solutions; [g] evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility and risk of the potential solutions; [h] implement the winning solution(s); and [i] take steps to make sure your solution(s) don’t unravel in the future.
The differences between the paradigms resides in supplementary steps and toolkits. For example, 8D contains the important “In
Your team is marching through the tools of your company's chosen problem-solving approach. This is time not spent on growing your business or delivering cost reductions. Yet your customers are suffering, and they're not shy about letting you know it! Why isn't it working?
