Developing Your Team IS Developing Your Career

A manager’s job is to facilitate their team’s success. This is a critical point to internalize - as a manager, you are measured on the performance of your team, not your direct individual contributions. This can be tough to accept for people who advanced to management roles by virtue of their performance as individual contributors. Remember, it only benefits you to develop your team members to their full potential.
To succeed at talent development, you must genuinely want to help people improve, and engender an environment of trust. Only then will people be receptive to your advice because they’ll believe that you have their best interests in mind (because you really do). The fact is, without this sincere foundational mindset, no advice will make someone a successful manager. You can’t fake it; don’t bother trying - people will see through the facade. If you are going in to an interaction expecting some sort of favor in return for your help, or holding back because you’re afraid your employee might develop into a rival then you’re done before you’ve even started. Your team members are not your rivals; developing them to handle some of the things you do means you won’t have to do those things anymore – it frees you up to get involved in bigger, better, exciting, new things.
Years ago, I began formally mentoring a colleague shortly after he was promoted to his first formal team management role. We hit it off, and for more than a decade I served as his advisor, sounding board, and confidante. He rapidly rose through the ranks (constantly developing and strengthening team members and colleagues along the way) and today is in a top executive role. While I’d like to take all the credit, the fact is he’s a very talented and driven person. Importantly he absolutely exudes sincerity. People trust his advice because they can tell that he doesn’t have a hidden agenda.
Strengthening your team by strengthening the players will ultimately result in more opportunities for everyone (including you). There is no point in pettiness or holding back your best guidance. It’s not a zero-sum game; there’ll be enough success to go around. Throughout my own career I’ve worked to help others succeed without expectation of any form of compensation from them, and I’ve had absolutely no fear that they might turn into rivals adversely affecting my own career aspirations. Both of these attitudes came across when working with direct reports and colleagues. They could sense that I was a true ally, genuinely acting in their best interest (and were therefore receptive to my advice). Knowing that making the team stronger created maximum value, I had confidence that there would be plenty of opportunities for me, and it proved true, there were.

Over the years we’ve been exposed to Six Sigma, Juran, Deming PDCA, 8D, Dale Carnegie, A3, Shainin, and more. Each technique works pretty well, and has been demonstrated many times in a wide variety of industries and circumstances. At the core they are all essentially the same!
Each approach relies on an underlying logical flow that goes like this: [a] make sure the problem is clearly defined; [b] be open to all sources of information; [c] vet the information for relevance and accuracy; [d] use the process of elimination to narrow down all possible causes to the most likely few; [e] prove which of the suspects is really the cause of the issue; [f] generate a number of potential solutions; [g] evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility and risk of the potential solutions; [h] implement the winning solution(s); and [i] take steps to make sure your solution(s) don’t unravel in the future.
The differences between the paradigms resides in supplementary steps and toolkits. For example, 8D contains the important “In

Your primary role as a manager is to ensure your team’s success. Internalize this. Make sure your team members know this. Build an environment of trust and collaboration. A direct report of mine would frequently leave me out of the loop as problems escalated, preferring instead to “work harder”. It was clear that he felt uncomfortable delivering bad news to me (his boss) when things were not going according to plan. Let me tell you the rest of the story.

I was struggling to get updates from my regional project management directors. Sensing my frustration at having to constantly repeat my (apparently futile) requests to the team to provide their updates consistently, my boss suggested, “If you want something done, schedule it.” He meant that if updates are needed at a specific time, actually schedule them directly on people's calendars, making the expectation and reminder "automatic" each month, and emphasizing the importance of the updates by turning them into meetings – people tend not to show up empty handed to meetings where they're expected to present. Scheduling removed a bit of "friction" and created a sense of urgency that resulted in real progress. Amazingly, they didn’t miss any updates after that point!

One of the best bits of advice I received when I first became a manager was to “delegate a task when your team member is 70% as good at it as you are, not 99%.” Many times, people are promoted to management positions because of their strong performance as individual contributors, but then they’re shocked to learn that a whole separate set of skills is required to succeed in their new role. Delegation is high on this list of new skills. Delegation means handing off tasks for someone else to do them. A common mistake is to only hand off a task when the team member is as good as you are at it. This is a trap! While it may seem like a good idea to protect the quality of the task, it doesn’t work in practice.

Don’t be fooled by the latest fad in project management, Agile. Agile is pitched as a revolutionary method, but the fact is, it simply DOES NOT GET THE RESULTS that visual waterfall approaches do. Period.
We see team after team fail using Agile methods, for very specific reasons. Let’s look at the 6 painful TRUTHs of using Agile methods. You don't need the latest fad, you need to use the best practices to manage a project to completion.

Problem-solving methods haven’t changed in over 20 years, and some methods have been around for 30-50 years without significant improvement. CAEDENCE has released a novel improvement to problem-solving that overcomes shortfalls in existing methods.
Applicable to all structured problem-solving approaches, Visual 8D™ enables teams to execute the familiar problem-solving steps (with no additional effort), while capturing plans and progress in easy-to-follow diagrams. Visual 8D™ puts teams in the position of providing answers to management and customer questions before being asked, resulting in improved control of the situation and minimizing time wasted on extraneous actions.

Being action-oriented is a good thing, right? Well, yes and no. There's a big difference between learning and adjusting quickly ("failing fast") and wasting time and resources by "rushing off half cocked".
Executives and teams alike are eager to be (and be seen) "doing something", but they often fail to recognize the distinction between 'activity' and 'progress'. As a result, they act upon the first reasonable idea that comes along. The trouble with acting on the first reasonable idea is twofold. First, there might have been much better ideas, and second, once you start working on the first idea, you stop looking for the better ones. Outcomes are often sub-optimal – problems not solved, product not launched, etc.
Want to dramatically improve your team's odds of achieving consistently strong outcomes? Next time everyone's ready to run with the first reasonable idea, set aside just 30 minutes and challenge the group with this 3-step process.